Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Johann Gamper <gamper(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it>, Michael Böhlen <boehlen(at)ifi(dot)uzh(dot)ch>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anton Dignös <anton(dot)dignoes(at)unibz(dot)it>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2017-02-24 20:25:34
Message-ID: 274d854f-a9be-bc65-691a-5c93516fd896@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/24/17 6:40 AM, Peter Moser wrote:
> Do you think it is better to remove the syntax for ranges expressed in
> different columns?

It's not that hard to construct a range type on-the-fly from 2 columns,
so (without having looked at the patch or really followed the thread) I
would think the answer is yes.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2017-02-24 20:25:55 Re: case_preservation_and_insensitivity = on
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2017-02-24 20:23:52 Re: bytea_output output of base64