Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL

From: David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Date: 2025-09-28 20:34:28
Message-ID: CAHM0NXjJdKgTC91VegL_SruOBn_PQoeCime_DZkOA02HChPDmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 2:18 PM David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 5:23 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Here's a v6 that's rebased up to HEAD and contains fixes for the
> > semantic issues we discussed. It still lacks documentation, but
> > otherwise I think it's about ready to go.
>
> Here is v7 with a stab at docs; fairly minimal at this point, but
> touching the two areas that are likely to need adjusting. When
> adjusting the docs for sql-select, I noticed that the grammar also
> supports `GROUP BY ALL <grouping_elements>`, so I also added a test to
> ensure that this syntax is explicitly supported. (It seems like it
> works as-is without further grammar adjustments, but I was a little
> worried when I first saw that fact... :D) Not sure that
> aggregates.sql is still the right place for all of these bits, but it
> does seem like having all things `GROUP BY ALL`-related tested in the
> same place is a nice property, so leaving there for now.

This time with attachment!

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-Add-GROUP-BY-ALL.patch application/octet-stream 18.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tristan Partin 2025-09-28 21:16:52 Re: Decouple C++ support in Meson's PGXS from LLVM enablement
Previous Message David Christensen 2025-09-28 19:18:48 Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL