From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Excessive LOG messages from replication slot sync worker |
Date: | 2025-08-12 10:14:38 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHe4Qhxv24-d9no5_WM68b1OcjabCOJYtofXZy4-q6JKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 6:25 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I believe that the format %X-%X also works with sscanf(). However, to maintain
> consistency, the format for sscanf() has been updated as well.
Yes.
Thanks for the patch!
Since we're changing the first "%X" in "%X-%X" to "%08X", the example
file names in the docs should be updated too. For example:
$ git grep "\.snap" | grep pglogicalinspect.sgml
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:name | 0-40796E18.snap
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:postgres=# SELECT * FROM
pg_get_logical_snapshot_meta('0-40796E18.snap');
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:name | 0-40796E18.snap
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:name | 0-40796E18.snap
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:postgres=# SELECT * FROM
pg_get_logical_snapshot_info('0-40796E18.snap');
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:name | 0-40796E18.snap
I also noticed that the regression tests for pg_logicalinspect use file
names in the old format. This doesn't cause test failures, but should
we update them to match the new format?
...
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/sql/pg_logicalinspect.sql:SELECT
pg_get_logical_snapshot_info('0/40796E18.snap');
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/sql/pg_logicalinspect.sql:SELECT
pg_get_logical_snapshot_info('../snapshots/0-40796E18.snap');
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/sql/pg_logicalinspect.sql:SELECT
pg_get_logical_snapshot_meta('0-40796E18.foo.snap');
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/sql/pg_logicalinspect.sql:SELECT
pg_get_logical_snapshot_meta('0/40796E18.snap');
...
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2025-08-12 10:21:55 | Re: Obsolete comments in ResultRelInfo struct |
Previous Message | shveta malik | 2025-08-12 09:59:22 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |