Re: Excessive LOG messages from replication slot sync worker

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Excessive LOG messages from replication slot sync worker
Date: 2025-08-12 10:14:38
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHe4Qhxv24-d9no5_WM68b1OcjabCOJYtofXZy4-q6JKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 6:25 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I believe that the format %X-%X also works with sscanf(). However, to maintain
> consistency, the format for sscanf() has been updated as well.

Yes.
Thanks for the patch!

Since we're changing the first "%X" in "%X-%X" to "%08X", the example
file names in the docs should be updated too. For example:

$ git grep "\.snap" | grep pglogicalinspect.sgml
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:name | 0-40796E18.snap
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:postgres=# SELECT * FROM
pg_get_logical_snapshot_meta('0-40796E18.snap');
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:name | 0-40796E18.snap
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:name | 0-40796E18.snap
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:postgres=# SELECT * FROM
pg_get_logical_snapshot_info('0-40796E18.snap');
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml:name | 0-40796E18.snap

I also noticed that the regression tests for pg_logicalinspect use file
names in the old format. This doesn't cause test failures, but should
we update them to match the new format?

...
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/sql/pg_logicalinspect.sql:SELECT
pg_get_logical_snapshot_info('0/40796E18.snap');
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/sql/pg_logicalinspect.sql:SELECT
pg_get_logical_snapshot_info('../snapshots/0-40796E18.snap');
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/sql/pg_logicalinspect.sql:SELECT
pg_get_logical_snapshot_meta('0-40796E18.foo.snap');
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/sql/pg_logicalinspect.sql:SELECT
pg_get_logical_snapshot_meta('0/40796E18.snap');
...

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2025-08-12 10:21:55 Re: Obsolete comments in ResultRelInfo struct
Previous Message shveta malik 2025-08-12 09:59:22 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication