| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hüseyin Demir <huseyin(dot)d3r(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: client_connection_check_interval default value |
| Date: | 2026-04-06 11:09:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHPcgESm_cqQ52xeJtLFjfFY4hr+s6byYiojNKOwxO3Mg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 4:59 AM Hüseyin Demir <huseyin(dot)d3r(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I created a regression test for the behaviour we mentioned before
> introducing further possible changes.
>
> You can review it. Basically I tried to simulate the desired behaviour
> which the current patch introduced.
Thanks for the patch!
Commit 557a9f1e3e6 recently added test for lock stats, which also causes
lock wait situations. So it seems better to extend that test to cover
log_lock_waits rather than adding a new TAP test file.
I've prepared a patch to do this. Patch attached. Thought?
Regards,
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Add-TAP-tests-for-log_lock_waits.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mihail Nikalayeu | 2026-04-06 11:21:32 | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2026-04-06 10:48:23 | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |