Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mircea Cadariu <cadariu(dot)mircea(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Zechman, Derek S" <Derek(dot)S(dot)Zechman(at)snapon(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
Date: 2025-08-18 02:36:48
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGhWjhKPZsorB6QG64dmaO0fVNERuWvfn98BYjVjT22EA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I also am leaning towards treating this as v19 material. It's a nontrivial
> behavior change, and this option is useful for major version upgrades,
> which is an area that we really don't want to surprise users too much.

+1

> Furthermore, auto-analyze doesn't process partitioned tables, either, so
> this introduces a bit of divergence. (I'd love to see that project picked
> up again someday. Perhaps I will take a gander...)

Sounds good!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2025-08-18 02:38:23 Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2025-08-15 16:45:54 Re: pgbackrest check info fails without success

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2025-08-18 02:38:23 Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-08-18 02:19:06 Re: Compilation issues for HASH_STATISTICS and HASH_DEBUG options