| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: vacuumdb and new VACUUM options |
| Date: | 2019-05-14 17:55:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwGPCuvbyn2xo_+c0XEKiaCSpvdUUwyfWmkeGLK-44O3Bg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:01 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:28:25PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Thank you! I've incorporated your comment in my branch. I'll post the
> > updated version patch after the above discussion got a consensus.
>
> Fujii-san, any input about the way to move forward here? Beta1 is
> planned for next week, hence it would be nice to progress on this
> front this week.
I think that we can push "--index-cleanup=BOOLEAN" version into beta1,
and then change the interface of the options if we received many
complaints about "--index-cleanup=BOOLEAN" from users. So this week,
I'd like to review Sawada's patch and commit it if that's ok.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2019-05-14 18:19:29 | Re: vacuumdb and new VACUUM options |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-14 17:52:23 | Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value |