Re: vacuumdb and new VACUUM options

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuumdb and new VACUUM options
Date: 2019-05-14 01:01:40
Message-ID: 20190514010140.GE1418@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:28:25PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Thank you! I've incorporated your comment in my branch. I'll post the
> updated version patch after the above discussion got a consensus.

Fujii-san, any input about the way to move forward here? Beta1 is
planned for next week, hence it would be nice to progress on this
front this week.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-14 01:06:05 Re: pg12 release notes
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-14 01:00:27 Re: Passing CopyMultiInsertInfo structure to CopyMultiInsertInfoNextFreeSlot()