Re: pgsql: Add missing index terms for replication commands in the document

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add missing index terms for replication commands in the document
Date: 2014-08-18 03:28:52
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGGg6O6AJj8jX4UFtS4jgzL9au2Cm6E-xir-NN=EuuhAg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Add missing index terms for replication commands in the document.
>>
>> Previously only CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT was exposed as an index term.
>> That's odd and there is no reason not to add index terms for other
>> replication commands.
> Wouldn't it be worth back-patching more a lighter patch for
> BASE_BACKUP, START_REPLICATION and TIMELINE_HISTORY and
> IDENTIFY_SYSTEM?

I don't feel inclined to do that because it's not a bug fix.
I have no objection if many people want that, though...

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-08-18 05:18:52 pgsql: Fix obsolete mention of non-int64 support in CREATE SEQUENCE doc
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-08-18 02:58:03 pgsql: Use ISO 8601 format for dates converted to JSON, too.