Re: pgsql: Add missing index terms for replication commands in the document

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add missing index terms for replication commands in the document
Date: 2014-08-20 23:33:15
Message-ID: 20140820233315.GF17822@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:28:52PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >> Add missing index terms for replication commands in the document.
> >>
> >> Previously only CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT was exposed as an index term.
> >> That's odd and there is no reason not to add index terms for other
> >> replication commands.
> > Wouldn't it be worth back-patching more a lighter patch for
> > BASE_BACKUP, START_REPLICATION and TIMELINE_HISTORY and
> > IDENTIFY_SYSTEM?
>
> I don't feel inclined to do that because it's not a bug fix.
> I have no objection if many people want that, though...

Agreed. I often avoid backpatching as it requires those who translate
the docs to make more adjustments for minor releases.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-08-21 00:10:03 Re: pgsql: Add missing index terms for replication commands in the document
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-08-20 23:05:12 pgsql: More regression test cases for json/jsonb extraction operators.