Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks
Date: 2019-09-18 12:09:12
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFAmooQTvF6TKxo_gyCpvdfsLLsYYCqKPF0YVbsq+uvCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:25 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:44:12AM +0000, Jamison, Kirk wrote:
> > On Friday, September 13, 2019 10:06 PM (GMT+9), Fujii Masao wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:51 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> As committed, the smgrdounlinkfork case is actually dead code; it's
> >>>> never called from anywhere. I left it in place just in case we want
> >>>> it someday.
> >>>
> >>> but if no use has appeared in 7 years, I say it's time to kill it.
> >>
> >> +1
> >
> > The consensus is we remove it, right?
>
> Yes. Just adding my +1 to nuke the function.

Okay, so committed.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ahsan Hadi 2019-09-18 12:29:52 Re: enhance SPI to support EXECUTE commands
Previous Message kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com 2019-09-18 11:46:17 RE: A problem presentaion about ECPG, DECLARE STATEMENT