From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks |
Date: | 2019-09-17 05:25:20 |
Message-ID: | 20190917052520.GG1660@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:44:12AM +0000, Jamison, Kirk wrote:
> On Friday, September 13, 2019 10:06 PM (GMT+9), Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:51 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>>> As committed, the smgrdounlinkfork case is actually dead code; it's
>>>> never called from anywhere. I left it in place just in case we want
>>>> it someday.
>>>
>>> but if no use has appeared in 7 years, I say it's time to kill it.
>>
>> +1
>
> The consensus is we remove it, right?
Yes. Just adding my +1 to nuke the function.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-09-17 06:21:34 | Re: [DOC] Document auto vacuum interruption |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-17 05:13:39 | Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor |