Re: [BUG?] lag of minRecoveryPont in archive recovery

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] lag of minRecoveryPont in archive recovery
Date: 2012-12-09 15:41:34
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEUpEvK=s0xRFinWnoasjhy3poD3HiE4namoWHK0a-d_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/storage.c b/src/backend/catalog/storage.c
> index 993bc49..d34ab65 100644
> --- a/src/backend/catalog/storage.c
> +++ b/src/backend/catalog/storage.c
> @@ -519,6 +519,12 @@ smgr_redo(XLogRecPtr lsn, XLogRecord *record)
> visibilitymap_truncate(rel, xlrec->blkno);
>
> FreeFakeRelcacheEntry(rel);
> +
> + /*
> + * Xlogs before this record is unrepeatable, so winding
> + * minRecoveryPoint to here.
> + */
> + XLogFlush(lsn);
> }
> else
> elog(PANIC, "smgr_redo: unknown op code %u", info);

I think that minRecoveryPoint should be updated before the data-file
changes, so XLogFlush() should be called before smgrtruncate(). No?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-12-09 15:56:49 Re: CommitFest #3 and upcoming schedule
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-12-09 15:36:31 Re: [BUG?] lag of minRecoveryPont in archive recovery