Re: Doubt on content under Routine Vacuuming section

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, sanjaya(dot)waruna(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doubt on content under Routine Vacuuming section
Date: 2026-06-11 14:28:53
Message-ID: CAHGQGwE41S7CHuZAKhdBAqgr4dBg456qiaK8Tog9dDZYCvkoPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 1:36 PM Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
> +1 on the fix, and the adding of the structname's.

LGTM.

> Given the commit that introduced this was backpatched to v14, ISTM
> this should probably be backpatched as well.

Barring any objections, I will commit the patch and backpatch it to v14.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2026-06-11 22:14:24 Terminology gaps around WAL
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2026-06-10 14:03:40 Re: Patch for bind message to clarify signedness of parameters and result column format codes