Terminology gaps around WAL

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Terminology gaps around WAL
Date: 2026-06-11 22:14:24
Message-ID: 69e10667fe9835cf3bc7b88741cb48fcaf43fb4c.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

I sometimes struggle to come up with the right term for the following
concepts, which come up a lot:

* The abstract set of WAL records that all originate from a single
initdb and share a system identifier; including all timelines, and
including old records that may have been deleted a long time ago.

* The "stuff" around that specific set of WAL records, such as running
instances, warm standbys, PITR'd instances, inactive instances, base
backups, and WAL archives.

"Database cluster" doesn't fit either of these. The docs define it as
"a collection of databases that is managed by a single instance of a
running database server." [1]

Do others already have good terms for these concepts? Is it worth
trying to invent and document some?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/creating-cluster.html

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2026-06-12 02:14:35 Re: Doubt on content under Routine Vacuuming section
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2026-06-11 14:28:53 Re: Doubt on content under Routine Vacuuming section