Re: row filtering for logical replication

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date: 2018-03-01 15:41:04
Message-ID: CAHE3wggyLr4CwnwmYnrVNXH6xRtjptmq=v0EL128Jvq1J9J+nw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2018-02-28 21:47 GMT-03:00 David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>:
> I noticed that the WHERE clause applies to all tables in the
> publication. Is that actually the right thing? I'm thinking of a
> case where we have foo(id, ...) and bar(foo_id, ....). To slice that
> correctly, we'd want to do the ids in the foo table and the foo_ids in
> the bar table. In the system as written, that would entail, at least
> potentially, writing a lot of publications by hand.
>
I didn't make it clear in my previous email and I think you misread
the attached docs. Each table can have an optional WHERE clause. I'll
made it clear when I rewrite the tests. Something like:

CREATE PUBLICATION tap_pub FOR TABLE tab_rowfilter_1 WHERE (a > 1000
AND b <> 'filtered'), tab_rowfilter_2 WHERE (c % 2 = 0),
tab_rowfilter_3;

Such syntax will not block another future feature that will publish
only few columns of the table.

> I also noticed that in psql, \dRp+ doesn't show the WHERE clause,
> which it probably should.
>
Yea, it could be added be I'm afraid of such long WHERE clauses.

> Does it need regression tests?
>
I included some tests just to demonstrate the feature but I'm planning
to add a separate test file for it.

--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-01 15:49:44 Re: change in behaviour for format_type() call
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-01 15:35:23 Re: 2018-03 Commitfest starts tomorrow