Re: change in behaviour for format_type() call

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: change in behaviour for format_type() call
Date: 2018-03-01 15:49:44
Message-ID: 22368.1519919384@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Commit a26116c6cbf4117e8efaa7cfc5bacc887f01517f changed the behaviour
> for format_type.
> ...
> Is this expected behaviour? attaching patch to get back the older
> behaviour.

I don't see anything in the commit message or linked discussion to
indicate that any visible behavior change was intended, so I think
you're right, this is a bug. Will check and push your patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2018-03-01 15:50:22 Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2018-03-01 15:41:04 Re: row filtering for logical replication