| From: | Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix typos |
| Date: | 2019-08-02 10:45:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAH7T-aqYBBWCng++209tU9sF0jR4xqQGNkzS_ki6LMt5jeRkdA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:11 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:01:59PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I think slight variations don't really detract from the value of the
> > product, and consider the odd variation a reminder of the diversity of
> > the project. I don't suggest that we purposefully introduce spelling
> > variations, or that we refrain from fixing ones that appear in code
> > we're changing, but I don't see the point in changing a line for the
> > sole reason of standardising the spelling of a word.
>
> Agreed. This always reminds me of ANALYZE vs. ANALYSE where we don't
> actually document the latter :)
>
I didn't know about that. That's a fun one!
>
> > That said, I'm not a native English speaker.
>
> Neither am I.
>
I am. Consistency is nice but either reads fine to me. Only brought it up
as I didn't see many other usages so seemed out of place.
Regards,
-- Sehrope Sarkuni
Founder & CEO | JackDB, Inc. | https://www.jackdb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2019-08-02 11:05:57 | Re: Built-in connection pooler |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-08-02 10:42:16 | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |