| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix typos |
| Date: | 2019-08-02 04:11:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20190802041107.GD19308@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:01:59PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think slight variations don't really detract from the value of the
> product, and consider the odd variation a reminder of the diversity of
> the project. I don't suggest that we purposefully introduce spelling
> variations, or that we refrain from fixing ones that appear in code
> we're changing, but I don't see the point in changing a line for the
> sole reason of standardising the spelling of a word.
Agreed. This always reminds me of ANALYZE vs. ANALYSE where we don't
actually document the latter :)
> That said, I'm not a native English speaker.
Neither am I.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-08-02 04:20:53 | Re: The unused_oids script should have a reminder to use the 8000-8999 OID range |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-08-02 04:07:43 | Re: How to install login_hook in Postgres 10.5 |