On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 7:52 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm not sure how likely such scenarios are, but it doesn't seem
> zero-risk. And if we do hundreds of these, the odds of trouble
> will increase.
I agree that it's not zero-risk -- hardly anything ever is. Still
seems worth considering.
--
Peter Geoghegan