Re: remove WITHOUT OIDS syntax for v19

From: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remove WITHOUT OIDS syntax for v19
Date: 2025-07-16 00:06:44
Message-ID: CAEG8a3Lb2_aMg_ywrCz4=3C2=CUmNN43YVRB4xiWZ5WJVMQXxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > WITH OIDS was removed in v12, I'm wondering if we could remove the
> > WITHOUT OIDS support for v19.
>
> Why?

Sorry I didn't mention the reason why I think WITHOUT OIDS should be removed.

WITHOUT OIDS has been a backward-compatible syntax for 6 years, so I
think maybe not too many users use it nowadays. Besides, there are
some hints in the code base that `WITHOUT OIDS` and `with (oids =
false)` will be removed someday(see the following diff), so I wonder
which day should it be?

-/* WITHOUT OIDS is legacy only */
OptWith:
WITH reloptions { $$ = $2; }
- | WITHOUT OIDS { $$ = NIL; }
| /*EMPTY*/

- /*
- * This is not a great place for this test,
but there's no other
- * convenient place to filter the option out.
As WITH (oids =
- * false) will be removed someday, this seems
like an acceptable
- * amount of ugly.
- */

>
> regards, tom lane

--
Regards
Junwang Zhao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2025-07-16 00:08:07 IndexAmRoutine aminsertcleanup function can be NULL?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-07-16 00:01:57 Re: patch: Use pg_assume in jsonb_util.c to fix GCC 15 warnings