Re: Deprecating, and scheduling removal of, pg_dump's tar format.

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Deprecating, and scheduling removal of, pg_dump's tar format.
Date: 2018-07-27 02:35:56
Message-ID: CAH2-WznacC-mMoGCrt4czgBz_Mcb09KRmiziStbZrQSjHhwySQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> The maintenance load is not high as well, so I see no real point in
> removing it, and that it would likely make people using it unhappy.

Why, specifically, would it make them unhappy?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-07-27 02:38:46 Re: Deprecating, and scheduling removal of, pg_dump's tar format.
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-07-27 02:33:36 Re: partition tree inspection functions