Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries
Date: 2017-04-07 18:45:36
Message-ID: CAH2-WznLVyqGYdo0M9hyhTCVFaH-BYbcNcunqVcvqs94WxtafA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
> - fair number of people don't think it's ready for v10.
> - can't move to next fest because it's waiting-on-author, which doesn't
> allow that. Doesn't strike me as a useful restriction.

I agree that that CF app restriction makes little sense.

> Indexes with Included Columns (was Covering + unique indexes)
> - Don't think concerns about #columns on truncated tuples have been
> addressed. Should imo be returned-with-feedback.

+1.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-07 18:46:11 Re: Partitioned tables vs GRANT
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-04-07 18:45:33 Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries