Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2018-04-06 17:42:07
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzn4N7HP4DS6Bzvd7hiozOseReu7mV1PftrUhANSCgUCRA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Thinking about that again, I found that we should relax our requirements to
> "minus infinity" items, because pg_upgraded indexes doesn't have any
> special bits set for those items.
>
> What do you think about applying following patch on the top of v14?

It's clearly necessary. Looks fine to me.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-04-06 17:43:00 Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-04-06 17:40:59 Re: Online enabling of checksums