| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE |
| Date: | 2018-04-06 17:43:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20180406174300.67wi42qciqbkrelx@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-04-06 20:39:26 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > On 2018-04-06 12:22:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > And as Robert has reminded me often that committers do not possess a
> > > veto that they can simply use to remove patches, there have been no
> > > reasonable grounds to revoke anything.
> >
> > Nor does a single committer overrule three other committers raising
> > doubts. Without even xresponding to their concerns.
> >
>
> BTW, what had happend to the idea of RMT voting for reverting patches?
My understanding is that the RMT managed period only really starts after
the 7th, once feature frozen. And I think it's highly desirable to
attempt resolving disputes without resorting to such force, if possible.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-04-06 17:57:40 | Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-04-06 17:39:26 | Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2018-04-06 17:45:03 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-04-06 17:42:07 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |