Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Date: 2022-04-14 00:17:00
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzn2Obp90oyZa5HN26rzG8ozzHM3dgkpLcsVzxTR+jK5NQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 4:51 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yeah, we have band-aided around this type of problem repeatedly.
> Making a fix that's readily accessible from any test script
> seems like a good idea.

We might even be able to consistently rely on this new option, given
*any* problem involving test stability and VACUUM. Having a
one-size-fits-all solution to these kinds of stability problems would
be nice -- no more DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING bandaids.

That general approach will be possible provided an inability to
acquire a cleanup lock during VACUUM (which can more or less occur at
random in most environments) doesn't ever lead to unexpected test
results. There is good reason to think that it might work out that
way. Simulating problems with acquiring cleanup locks during VACUUM
left me with the impression that that could really work:

https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkiB-qcsBmWrpzP0nxvrQExoUts1d7TYShg_DrkOHeg4Q@mail.gmail.com

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-04-14 00:17:31 VPath Build Errors
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-04-13 23:56:45 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70