Re: Reducing the WAL overhead of freezing in VACUUM by deduplicating per-tuple freeze plans

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reducing the WAL overhead of freezing in VACUUM by deduplicating per-tuple freeze plans
Date: 2023-01-12 00:06:31
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmiSVfrCdFQ8H3_oxXxXBgemfHU=U+6x_11xu0zUEL0LA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 2:18 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> I'll try to get back to it this week.

Attached patch fixes up these issues. It's almost totally mechanical.

(Ended up using "git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra
--color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space" with this, per your recent tip,
which did help.)

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Rename-freeze-plan-dedup-routines.patch application/octet-stream 11.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2023-01-12 00:26:19 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-01-12 00:04:37 Re: Refactor recordExtObjInitPriv()