Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Date: 2018-02-02 16:14:19
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzm_C4HhbOce8Or2-uubsuNxwgc3y26G7f_BBTyZP2Oong@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
> I can try to do this before next CF. But ISTM that EDB and Postgres Pro already have various flavours of similar feature. Maybe they are planning to publish that?

I would definitely review that patch.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-02-02 16:16:50 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-02-02 16:11:44 Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach