Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date: 2020-05-10 01:48:02
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmUnA-jxDQKcz+nAGEkT4D0mW-yS2Rg-ss72b43Uo3S3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 3:19 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm generally OK with most of this - I'd probably keep the single-line
> format, but I don't feel very strongly about that and if others think
> using two lines is better ...
>
> Barring objections I'll get this polished and pushed soon-ish (say,
> early next week).

I see something about starting a new thread on the Open Items page.
Please CC me on this.

Speaking in my capacity as an RMT member: Glad to see that you plan to
close this item out next week. (I had planned on giving you a nudge
about this, but it looks like I don't really have to now.)

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-10 02:00:36 Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-10 01:37:59 Re: Add -Wold-style-definition to CFLAGS?