Re: [PATCH] SortSupport for macaddr type

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Brandur Leach <brandur(at)mutelight(dot)org>, Neha Khatri <nehakhatri5(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SortSupport for macaddr type
Date: 2017-03-18 22:22:43
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmSOdXiWJBs7ZJO+WanE7TuQ6w4+_RkAGH_DyOhsts+9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> This seems fine to me, especially
> because it lets us compare macaddr using simple 3-way unsigned int
> comparisons, which isn't otherwise the case.

Out of idle curiosity, I decided to generate disassembly of both
macaddr_cmp_internal(), and the patch's abbreviated comparator. The
former consists of 49 x86-64 instructions at -02 on my machine,
totaling 135 bytes of object code. The latter consists of only 10
instructions, or 24 bytes of object code.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2017-03-18 22:40:42 Composite IS NULL again, this time with plpgsql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-03-18 21:57:47 Re: mat views stats