Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Date: 2021-05-18 15:54:56
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmF4WX4KXnzAZv5wABnx1KLkQ1-puRqRmgfXzHFbZMbpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:48 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I am thiking the vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor existance in a PG 14
> postgresql.conf will throw an error, unlike 13.x, so I do think we need
> to mention this so people will know to remove it from their
> postgresql.conf before upgrades, right? I don't think the PG 13.3
> release note mention really makes it clear it has to be removed. In a
> dump/restore, so we retain the reloption
> vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor and just ignore it, or drop it on
> restore? I am hoping it is the later.

There is no dump/restore hazard on upgrade to 14, since the
vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor reloption remains in place (it's
just not in psql tab completion anymore, nor is it documented, etc).

It is possible (though I would certainly say unlikely) that the
vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor GUC will be in somebody's
postgresql.conf from an earlier version, and won't be recognized on
upgrade to v14. So maybe you need to say something about that
particular issue -- which could be framed as finishing off the process
started by the 13.3 commit. But that's it.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-05-18 15:57:11 Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-05-18 15:50:45 Re: Added missing tab completion for alter subscription set option