From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |
Date: | 2021-05-18 15:48:10 |
Message-ID: | 20210518154810.GD30270@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:34:55AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> In my opinion this should be interpreted as already handled by the
> backpatch to 13.3, and so not necessary to handle again now -- despite
> the GUC thing. It's possible that no users set the GUC at all, because
> it wasn't particularly well thought out. This entire situation is
> probably unprecedented (we just don't deprecate reloptions very
> often), so I defer to your judgement, Bruce.
I am thiking the vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor existance in a PG 14
postgresql.conf will throw an error, unlike 13.x, so I do think we need
to mention this so people will know to remove it from their
postgresql.conf before upgrades, right? I don't think the PG 13.3
release note mention really makes it clear it has to be removed. In a
dump/restore, so we retain the reloption
vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor and just ignore it, or drop it on
restore? I am hoping it is the later.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-05-18 15:50:45 | Re: Added missing tab completion for alter subscription set option |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-05-18 15:34:55 | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |