Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2019-02-11 19:54:13
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzm3YQy0R6AP39JUMyiYVYLjgUheYgFcfPZm0xfWyokAuw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:46 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think we're done with this thread, though I still need to look at
> the problem I complained of in <26527(dot)1549572789(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>.

Right, we're done with this thread now. Thanks again!

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-11 20:04:45 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-02-11 19:46:43 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)