| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages) |
| Date: | 2019-02-11 20:04:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20190211200445.GA30250@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Feb-11, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've pushed this now. I made one additional change, which was to fix
> things so that if both an INTERNAL and an EXTENSION dependency exist,
> the first loop will reliably complain about the EXTENSION dependency.
> It only takes one more if-test to do that now that we're postponing
> the error report till after the loop, and this way we don't need to
> split hairs about how likely it is for both to exist.
>
> I think we're done with this thread, though I still need to look at
> the problem I complained of in <26527(dot)1549572789(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>.
Thanks for taking care of this!
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2019-02-11 20:29:48 | Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-02-11 19:54:13 | Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages) |