Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Aleksandr Parfenov <a(dot)parfenov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV
Date: 2018-02-07 01:56:25
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzkh3rgJhpfVv9faFtbzgPae2z8z+oGsYSjD1Gg8S4jauA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> In a quick look at the patches, WIP-kludge-fix.patch seems clearly
>> unacceptable for back-patching because it changes the signature and
>> behavior of ExecResetTupleTable, which external code might well be using.

> Definitely is using, in the case of BDR and pglogical. But we can patch in a
> version check easily enough.

That won't be necessary. The WIP-kludge-fix.patch approach is never
going to be used, and was only really posted for illustrative
purposes.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Seungmin Lucas Yoo 2018-02-07 10:27:20 About error in pgadmin when making server
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2018-02-07 01:54:09 Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-02-07 02:00:49 Re: Query running for very long time (server hanged) with parallel append
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2018-02-07 01:54:09 Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV