Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Date: 2018-08-11 02:58:05
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzk_DWsf1bB8NwoKhOM13wkp0Ycjzbg0zfmrr8TGKn1FjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Didn't take long to show that the relmapper issue wasn't it:
>
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypu&dt=2018-08-10%2021%3A21%3A40
>
> So we're back to square one. Although Tomas' recent report might
> give us something new to chase.

Thanks for pointing out that Tomas had a lead - I missed that.

I'm concerned that this item has the potential to delay the release,
since, as you said, we're back to the drawing board.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-08-11 03:02:57 Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-11 02:45:30 Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes