Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Date: 2018-08-11 02:45:30
Message-ID: 465.1533955530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Oooh ... but pg_class wouldn't be big enough to get a parallel
>> index rebuild during that test, would it?

> Typically not, but I don't think that we can rule it out right away.

Didn't take long to show that the relmapper issue wasn't it:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypu&dt=2018-08-10%2021%3A21%3A40

So we're back to square one. Although Tomas' recent report might
give us something new to chase.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-08-11 02:58:05 Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-08-11 02:09:20 Re: [sqlsmith] ERROR: partition missing from subplans