| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: run pgindent in CI |
| Date: | 2026-11-05 21:48:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzk4HNi+s-rCV80=EoLhBEBSaV9xewO5C86zoxXkdNjCBw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 4:35 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> I think that would be lost in the noise on CI. It would be welcome for
> local use, of course.
Another way of looking at it: if we're now going to start requiring
that every patch be pgindent'ed at all times, or else we get these
soft CI failures, it really should be as easy as possible to be in
compliance.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2026-11-05 22:04:33 | Re: Code-comment typos. |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2026-11-05 21:47:20 | Re: run pgindent in CI |