| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Юрий Соколов <funny(dot)falcon(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sokolov Yura <funny(dot)falcon(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples |
| Date: | 2017-11-28 23:00:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzk19G5=RxQpgfUirRvihjrMvZSMSi=u53TbMbvLj1+5vA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Maybe it's a stupid question. But would we still want to have this after
> the change? These should be just specializations of the template version
> imo.
I also wonder why regression test output has changed. Wasn't this
supposed to be a mechanical change in how the templating is
implemented? Why would the behavior of the algorithm change, even if
the change is only a change in the output order among equal elements?
Also, is that one last raw CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in the template
definition supposed to be there?
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-28 23:12:11 | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: Add support for INSERT OVERRIDING clause |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-28 22:57:48 | Re: pgindent run? |