Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Юрий Соколов <funny(dot)falcon(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sokolov Yura <funny(dot)falcon(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Date: 2017-11-28 22:41:50
Message-ID: 20171128224150.syswowiaiojth7ke@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2017-11-28 23:30:53 +0300, Юрий Соколов wrote:
> index 1a8ee08c8b..607ed6a781 100644
> --- a/src/port/qsort.c
> +++ b/src/port/qsort.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
> * in favor of a simple check for presorted input.
> * Take care to recurse on the smaller partition, to bound stack usage.
> *
> - * CAUTION: if you change this file, see also qsort_arg.c, gen_qsort_tuple.pl
> + * CAUTION: if you change this file, see also qsort_arg.c, qsort_template.h
> *
> * src/port/qsort.c
> */

Maybe it's a stupid question. But would we still want to have this after
the change? These should be just specializations of the template version
imo.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-28 22:42:22 Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-28 22:36:45 Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.