From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: xid wraparound danger due to INDEX_CLEANUP false |
Date: | 2020-04-16 01:11:40 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzk-xvLOHsZmVJ7Y=eOdXRoEr3iM5iaMtb510ZHpFCjRkg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:57 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I seem to recall Simon raising this issue at the time that the patch
> was being discussed, and I thought that we had eventually decided that
> it was OK for some reason. But I don't remember the details, and it is
> possible that we got it wrong. :-(
It must be unreliable because it's based on something that is known to
be unreliable:
Also, the commit message of 6655a729 says that nbtree has had this
problem "since time immemorial". I am planning to work on that
problem, eventually.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Coleman | 2020-04-16 01:44:48 | Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-16 00:40:28 | Re: tadarida vs REL_12_STABLE |