Re: xid wraparound danger due to INDEX_CLEANUP false

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: xid wraparound danger due to INDEX_CLEANUP false
Date: 2020-04-15 23:57:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYnPjJ=6ysGBnWzPuy557f7VA5HSZ4X0KRyVChS5HRUVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:38 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> It's possible that something protects against dangers in the case of
> INDEX CLEANUP false, or that the consequences aren't too bad. But I
> didn't see any comments about the danagers in the patch.

I seem to recall Simon raising this issue at the time that the patch
was being discussed, and I thought that we had eventually decided that
it was OK for some reason. But I don't remember the details, and it is
possible that we got it wrong. :-(

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-16 00:40:28 Re: tadarida vs REL_12_STABLE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-04-15 23:55:34 Re: where should I stick that backup?