| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
| Date: | 2018-04-10 20:37:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=gj0qn_QvRaHQshjopQzb4_S+CGabDbUkh2ygmeoTFFA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
>> * Not sure that all calls to BTreeInnerTupleGetDownLink() are limited
>> to inner tuples, which might be worth doing something about (perhaps
>> just renaming the macro).
>
> What is suspicious place for you opinion?
_bt_mark_page_halfdead() looked like it had a problem, but it now
looks like I was wrong. I also verified every other
BTreeInnerTupleGetDownLink() caller. It now looks like everything is
good here.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2018-04-10 20:49:11 | Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes |
| Previous Message | Alexander Kuzmenkov | 2018-04-10 20:31:47 | Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP |