Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs
Date: 2022-11-16 04:48:56
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=HMsKC4i7cgujg7yrMeM_QiF_e573gTyfAreJasMTHOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 5:29 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> If we want to focus on the mvcc affects we could just go for something like
> snapshotConflictHorizon or such.

Okay, let's go with snapshotConflictHorizon. I'll use that name in the
next revision, which I should be able to post tomorrow.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2022-11-16 05:01:06 Re: Allow file inclusion in pg_hba and pg_ident files
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2022-11-16 04:48:30 Re: vacuumlo: add test to vacuumlo for test coverage