Re: Why not try for a HOT update, even when PageIsFull()?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why not try for a HOT update, even when PageIsFull()?
Date: 2021-11-22 00:29:11
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=1oCXbEbdYqHg3=fuvsnem8bsrnU_YejhSOoiHENE3fQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:51 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Hmm, I don't have any memory of introducing this; and if you look at the
> thread, you'll notice that it got there between the first patch I posted
> and the second one, without any mention of the reason. I probably got
> that code from the WARM patch series at some point, thinking that it was
> an obvious optimization; but I'm fairly certain that we didn't run any
> tailored micro-benchmark to justify it.

I suspected that it was something like that. I agree that it's
unlikely that we'll be able to do another HOT update for as long as
the page has PD_PAGE_FULL set. But that's not saying much; it's also
unlikely that heap_update will find that PD_PAGE_FULL is set to begin
with. And, the chances of successfully applying HOT again are workload
dependent.

> I certainly do not object to removing it.

I'd like to do so soon. I'll wait a few more days, in case Pavan objects.

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-11-22 00:47:28 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-21 23:04:27 Re: Windows: Wrong error message at connection termination