Re: Why not try for a HOT update, even when PageIsFull()?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why not try for a HOT update, even when PageIsFull()?
Date: 2021-11-19 19:50:54
Message-ID: 202111191950.kjuy2nz66crg@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Nov-17, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> Commit 2fd8685e7f simplified the checking of modified attributes that
> takes place within heap_update(). This included a micro-optimization
> that affects pages marked PageIsFull(): when the target page is marked
> with PD_PAGE_FULL (which must have been set by a previous heap_update
> call), don't even try to use HOT -- assume that we have no chance in
> order to save a few cycles on determining HOT safety.

Hmm, I don't have any memory of introducing this; and if you look at the
thread, you'll notice that it got there between the first patch I posted
and the second one, without any mention of the reason. I probably got
that code from the WARM patch series at some point, thinking that it was
an obvious optimization; but I'm fairly certain that we didn't run any
tailored micro-benchmark to justify it. Pavan may have something to say
about it, so I CC him.

I certainly do not object to removing it.

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Find a bug in a program, and fix it, and the program will work today.
Show the program how to find and fix a bug, and the program
will work forever" (Oliver Silfridge)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-11-19 19:54:46 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Previous Message Virender Singla 2021-11-19 19:48:58 Re: TOAST - why separate visibility map