Re: WAL consistency check facility

From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date: 2016-11-11 08:53:00
Message-ID: CAGz5QCKOe=qcCYGozX-y+3rqHWm7ayGa0aYbT7htLiDpYZzChg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> So, who are all of the people involved in the effort to produce this
>> patch, and what's the right way to attribute credit?
>
> The original idea was from Heikki as he has introduced the idea of
> doing such checks if you look at the original thread. I added on top
> of it a couple of things like the concept of page masking, and hacked
> an early version of the versoin we have now
> (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqR4vxdKijP+Du82vOcOnGMvutq-gfqiU2dsH4bsM77hYg@mail.gmail.com).
> So it seems to me that marking Heikki as an author would be fair as
> the original idea is from him. I don't mind being marked only as a
> reviewer of the feature, or as someone from which has written an
> earlier version of the patch, but I let that up to your judgement.
> Kuntai is definitely an author.
Although lot of changes have been done later, but I've started with the patch
attached in the above thread. Hence, I feel the author of that patch should
also get the credit.

--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-11-11 09:10:16 [PATCH] Allow TAP tests to be run individually
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-11-11 08:03:41 Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?