Re: backend type in log_line_prefix?

From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backend type in log_line_prefix?
Date: 2020-03-10 17:05:05
Message-ID: CAGz5QCJefxahQsr6RCmBiBKGq_XehkNHEEfntgRVsjHr6-dXig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:11 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2020-03-09 16:20, Kuntal Ghosh wrote:
> > In v3-0001-Refactor-ps_status.c-API.patch,
> > - * postgres: walsender <user> <host> <activity>
> > This part is still valid, right?
> Sure but I figured this comment was in the context of the explanation of
> how the old API was being abused, so it's no longer necessary.
>
Makes sense.

> set_ps_display() checks update_process_title itself and does nothing if
> it's off, so this should work okay.
Right.

--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Kondratov 2020-03-10 17:05:24 Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM
Previous Message David Steele 2020-03-10 16:50:48 Re: [PATCH] Connection time for \conninfo