Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

2016-03-22 16:07 GMT+02:00 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:

> I've been ranting about this on Twitter for a while, and now blogged about
> it:
>
>
> http://people.planetpostgresql.org/devrim/index.php?/archives/89-9.6,-or-10.0.html
>
> There are major changes in 9.6 (some of them are listed in the blog post),
> and
> I think they are good enough to call this 10.0.
>
> A counter argument might be waiting for pglogical for inclusion, but I
> think
> the current changes are enough to warrant a .0 release.
>

For me, Parallel features are a milestone to the native Partitioning.

I would prefer to keep it 9.6 for now and switch to 10.0 when Partitioning
will be added.

Besides, 9.6 will be the first release with `6` as the second digit :)

--
Victor Y. Yegorov