| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-03-22 14:11:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20160322141102.GC11970@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 04:07:42PM +0200, Devrim Gunduz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been ranting about this on Twitter for a while, and now blogged about it:
>
> http://people.planetpostgresql.org/devrim/index.php?/archives/89-9.6,-or-10.0.html
>
> There are major changes in 9.6 (some of them are listed in the blog post), and
> I think they are good enough to call this 10.0.
>
> A counter argument might be waiting for pglogical for inclusion, but I think
> the current changes are enough to warrant a .0 release.
>
> What do you think?
I think a big question is whether we want to save 10.0 for some
incompatibility changes, though we didn't do that for 8.0 or 9.0.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Victor Yegorov | 2016-03-22 14:11:22 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2016-03-22 14:10:46 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |