Re: Pgpool-II 4.7.0 released.

Op vr 23 jan 2026 om 08:25 schreef Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
>
> > Ok, so we will have following 4 new params?
> >
> > wd_listen_addresses
> > wd_listen_port
> > wd_heartbeat_listen_addresses
> > wd_heartbeat_listen_port
>
> After thinking more, I feel like it would be overkill to allow to
> specify multiple IPs for wd_listen_addresses and
> wd_heartbeat_listen_addresses.
>
> If so, we can decide to allow only 1 IP for each parameter and change
> the names to:
>
> wd_listen_address
> wd_heartbeat_listen_address
>
> What do you think?

Yes, that makes sense to me. I don't see any reason to have multiple
addresses for those. If you do allow multiple addresses, that would
only be for consistency with the other options, like listen_addresses
and pcp_listen_addresses. We are going to use '*' anyway, because in a
docker container that works fine.

For some reason, our configuration file already contains a
wd_heartbeat_port, which I can't find in the manual. But it even
contains a comment stating that a change requires a restart, so it
must have come from somewhere:

wd_heartbeat_port = 9694
# Port number for receiving heartbeat signal
# (change requires restart)

Best regards,
Emond